In 2018 and 2019 U.S. farmers and ranchers nationwide weathered several major disasters — including wildfires, a volcanic eruption, two Category 4 hurricanes, an earthquake, tornadoes and major flooding. The direct financial estimates of the damage — which include several factors such as infrastructure damage, supply-chain disruption and business interruption as well as the loss of crops and livestock — are still being compiled. But it’s possible to assess the economic contribution of agriculture in the regions most affected by those natural disasters.

A recent “Feeding the Economy” study was sponsored by the American Farm Bureau Federation and other organizations. Major disaster declaration data was made available from the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Using that data we can measure the direct economic contribution from agriculture as well as the total number of jobs directly tied to agriculture in those disaster-impacted areas.

The total economic contribution of agriculture in congressional districts in which major natural disasters occurred in 2018 and 2019 is estimated at $83.8 billion; it encompasses 419,000 direct agriculture-related jobs. Those economic contributions include all monetary market transactions and jobs directly related to farming in congressional districts that contain a county with a FEMA-declared natural disaster. The FEMA disasters included for our analysis are several.

  • wildfires in California
  • volcanic eruption in Hawaii
  • hurricanes Florence and Michael
  • earthquake in Alaska
  • recent tornado outbreak in Lee County, Alabama
  • devastating flooding in the Midwest

An economic contribution analysis was not available for Puerto Rico and so the impact of natural disasters on that agricultural economy was not included in the totals.

Importantly those economic contribution and employment statistics should not be considered as financial estimates associated with the recovery effort. Additionally the congressional districts included in the analysis are often wider than the region represented by the county-level disaster declarations. Thus the economic output and employment statistics serve only to highlight the contribution of agriculture in those areas.

The economic contribution of agriculture was the greatest in flood-related disaster areas, at $56 billion and 195,000 direct jobs.

  • The area struck by Hurricane Florence came in at $13 billion and 97,000 direct jobs.
  • Hurricane Michael and the tropical storm it was eventually downgraded to did damage in areas representing $7 billion in agricultural economic contributions and 72,000 jobs.
  • The areas impacted by the California wildfires represented $5 billion in agricultural economic contributions and 31,000 jobs.
  • In Alaska, which suffered from an earthquake in late 2018, agriculture contributes $1.3 billion in economic output and represents 12,000 jobs.
  • In Hawaii, where agriculture across the islands represents an economic contribution of $523 million and nearly 12,000 jobs, the Big Island’s Kilauea volcano erupted in 2018.
  • In Lee County, Alabama, agriculture’s economic contribution represented $284 million and nearly 100 jobs.

Figure 1 highlights the economic contribution of agriculture by natural-disaster classification.

Overall 65 congressional districts included a FEMA-designated disaster county in 2018 or 2019 associated with the wildfires, hurricanes, tornados, floods, earthquake or volcanic eruption.

  • For disaster-impacted regions the direct agricultural economic contribution was the greatest in Nebraska’s 3rd Congressional District at $15.7 billion.
  • Iowa’s 4th Congressional District was affected at $13.2 billion.
  • Nebraska’s 1st Congressional District was affected at $6.8 billion.

Figure 2 identifies agriculture’s direct economic contribution by congressional district.

  • Similar to the economic contributions, direct agricultural jobs were the greatest in Nebraska’s 3rd District at nearly 47,000 jobs.
  • Iowa’s 4th District was affected with nearly 45,000 jobs.
  • Missouri’s 6th District contained more than 37,000 direct agricultural jobs.

Figure 3 identifies direct agriculture-related jobs in disaster-impacted congressional districts.

Summary

The total economic contribution of agriculture in congressional districts associated with natural disasters that occurred in 2018 and 2019 is estimated at $83.8 billion and represents 419,000 direct agriculture-related jobs. Farmers and ranchers in those areas who have suffered property and infrastructure damage, lost crops and/or livestock, lost soil and nutrients, and endured a disruption of business will rebuild in the weeks, months and years to come.

Private estimates of the costs associated with the flooding alone are in the billions. Nebraska faces more than $1.3 billion in flood losses. Farm losses drive Iowa’s flood damage to $2 billion. Congress recently received financial assessments related to a portion of the damage from natural disasters at $7 billion.

Livestock producers may be able to use the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Livestock Indemnity Program to receive financial support for lost or injured livestock, but the assistance is limited to 75 percent of the market value. Crop insurance is available for some of the commodities damaged by natural disasters. But it’s revenue-based insurance and doesn’t cover the financial losses associated with harvested commodities damaged or lost while in storage. Additionally crop insurance doesn’t cover the future financial losses associated with a downed orchard. For crops not covered by crop insurance, USDA’s Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program may provide some financial assistance.

To assist farmers and ranchers in the rebuilding efforts, Congress is considering a much-needed relief package of $3 billion. It’s similar to one lawmakers passed for farmers impacted in 2017 by wildfires and hurricanes. Federally funded disaster assistance is as critical as ever with recent disasters more widespread and farmers and ranchers everywhere facing a severe economic downturn and mounting trade pressure.

John Newton is a chief economist with the American Farm Bureau Federation’s Market Intel. Visit www.fb.org/market-intel for more information.