Price cycles 0617

Editor’s note: The following was written by Darrel Good, Todd Hubbs and Scott Irwin, University of Illinois ag economists, for the university Farmdoc Daily website.

The downturn in crop prices that began in mid- to late-2014, and continues today, has led to declining farm income and downward pressure on farmland values and rents.

The financial condition of many farms has worsened as a result. In this environment, there is an understandable interest in the subject of when crop prices might recover. This naturally leads to the question of whether there are predictable crop price cycles in the long-run.

Many attempts in price analysis rely on an intuitive, and relatively simple, causal chain exemplifying the relationship between price and quantity in crop markets. High prices create the impetus for more production, which in turn, leads to more acreage. This acreage expansion creates a larger quantity supplied to the market which results in lower prices. These lower prices result in less acreage planted for production and eventually will result in prices moving higher.

This process then repeats over time in a classical cobweb framework. This intuitive explanation of crop market dynamics presents an argument for a cyclical, and therefore somewhat predictable, pattern of price formation over time. While intuitively appealing, this cyclical framework for thinking about long-run price determination requires careful examination, which is the purpose of this article.

Examination of lon-grun price movements first requires a determination of what constitutes the long-run. We have argued for some time that corn, soybean and wheat prices since January 1947 can be broken into three distinct long-run periods, or eras. The first era spanned 1947 through 1972; the second era encompassed 1973 through November 2006; and the third era is currently underway with price data available through April 2017.

We argue the shifts into new eras in 1973 and 2006 were associated with underlying changes in demand for corn.

Figure 1 provides a graph of nominal monthly average Illinois corn prices and presents the average price for each of the two eras through currently available data provided by NASS. As can be seen in Figure 1, prices move around the average price of each era. Three characteristics of price behavior in each era can be identified: (1) prices exhibit significant levels of volatility early in the era, (2) there have been extended periods with prices above and below the average, and (3) there is a tendency for large price spikes within an era associated with supply phenomena or macroeconomic shocks that have extended impacts on prices over time.

The price history depicted in Figure 1 shows a clear pattern of the monthly price deviating from the average price and then moving back to the average price, a process that statisticians call "mean reversion."

We recognize the market environments between eras vary substantially. In particular, Federal commodity policy changed substantially over the decades and these policies may have impacted price behavior. Regardless, we see the characteristics of historical price patterns within each era, as well as the underlying dynamics of price determination, as containing useful information in forming expectations for the average price as the new era of prices continues.

To evaluate the prospects for average corn prices in the current era requires an identification of the factors that launched the transition to the previous era that began in 1973. Those factors included changing exchange rate policies, escalating energy and price inflation, and large grain purchases by the former Soviet Union. The entire period witnessed expanding export markets and continuous consumption growth through 2006.

Simultaneously, production increased at a similar rate creating a stable supply and demand relationship interrupted by infrequent events. One can think of the stable fundamental relationship over the entire era as the average price of corn during the period. The average price of corn in the era was $2.42 per bushel. Supply concerns related to drought and larger issues related to the economy exemplify the type of infrequent events moving prices.

It is straightforward to observe the end of the second era and the beginning of the current price era in corn. The change in policy related to the Renewable Fuels Standard beginning in 2005 created a major increase in demand for corn for ethanol production that resulted in substantially higher average prices beginning in late 2006.

Similar to that of the previous era, prices have also been extremely volatile in the current era, ranging from a low of $3 in the first month of the new era to a high of $7.58 in August 2012. The price volatility reflects a range of supply and demand conditions that included the financial crisis of 2008, shifts in U.S. and world corn acreage, severe drought in the U.S and South America in 2012, four consecutive years of very large crops in the U.S from 2013 through 2016, and generally sluggish economic growth for much of the past 10 years.

While the available price data is helpful for identifying the average price in the new era, the deviations and reversions to the average price do not occur in a predictable cycle in terms of either magnitude of deviations or duration of deviations

So, where does this leave producers with regard to crop marketing? While price fluctuations around the average price are indeed very difficult to predict from month-to-month, the longer-run mean reversion tendency of prices provides some useful guidelines for producer marketing.

Specifically, mean reversion implies that producers should minimize sales when prices are significantly below the long-run equilibrium price and sell more aggressively when prices are well above the equilibrium price. For example, we recommended a rule-of-thumb of not marketing heavily below a monthly average price of $3.75 per bushel but marketing aggressively above $5.25.

The challenges to that strategy, however, are significant. First, the average, or equilibrium price for any era, including the current era, is not known with certainty until the era is over. Second, the magnitude and duration of prices above or below the expected equilibrium price are not known, which is why this is only a rule-of-thumb rather than a highly precise timing signal for marketing.

The monthly average corn price in Illinois has been $4.57 per bushel since December 2006, but the price was below that average for 34 consecutive months ending in April 2017. The immediate question, then, is the expectation for an average price near $4.60 for the current era too high? If so, what is a more realistic expectation?

There is still some uncertainty in forecasting the average corn price during the current era even though the era is in its eleventh year.

Prices admittedly face some head winds in the near term in the form of a mature ethanol market and slow economic growth both domestically and internationally. When prices do move back to and above the average price, the challenge for corn producers will be to judge the magnitude of the potential price increase and time pricing decisions accordingly. Given the extended current period of low prices, there may be a risk of under-estimating the potential magnitude of higher prices.

Sign up for our Daily Headlines newsletter

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.